Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Ambient Ozone Exposure and Pneumothorax Risk After CT-Guided Lung Biopsy.

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background/objectives To evaluate whether day-of-procedure ambient ozone exposure is associated with pneumothorax after CT-guided lung biopsy.Methods This retrospective single-centre study included 160 CT-guided lung biopsies performed between January 2018 and February 2026. Environmental data from the day of biopsy were assigned from the nearest national monitoring station. The primary outcome was any pneumothorax on post-biopsy CT; the secondary outcome was drainage-requiring pneumothorax. Multivariable logistic regression included ozone exposure, emphysema, and access route through dependent lung area (ARDA). Ozone was analysed as a continuous variable per 10 μg/m3 and, exploratorily, using a ROC-derived threshold of ≥75.8 μg/m3. Restricted cubic splines assessed nonlinearity. Sensitivity models adjusted for needle size, biopsy system, operator identity, and season. Drainage-requiring pneumothorax was analysed using Firth logistic regression.Results Pneumothorax occurred after 86 of 160 biopsies (53.8%), and 13 biopsies (8.1%) required drainage. Ozone was not associated with pneumothorax when modelled linearly (OR, 1.09 per 10 μg/m3; 95% CI, 0.97-1.23; p = 0.167). In exploratory threshold modelling, ozone ≥ 75.8 μg/m3 was associated with pneumothorax (OR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.39-5.61; p = 0.004). Emphysema increased pneumothorax odds (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.03-4.68; p = 0.047), whereas ARDA was protective (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.11-0.45; p < 0.001). Spline analysis supported nonlinearity (p = 0.001). For drainage-requiring pneumothorax, only emphysema was significant.Conclusions Ambient ozone showed an exploratory nonlinear association with pneumothorax after CT-guided lung biopsy, with a threshold signal around 70-80 μg/m3. ARDA was protective, whereas emphysema was associated with drainage-requiring pneumothorax.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

La source scientifique ouverte est momentanément indisponible.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Society of Interventional Radiology pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisation à but non lucratif
  • University institute of Diagnostic pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure

Society of Interventional Radiology et University institute of Diagnostic.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Air Quality and Health ImpactsMedical and Biological Ozone ResearchOccupational and environmental lung diseases

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.