Ambient Ozone Exposure and Pneumothorax Risk After CT-Guided Lung Biopsy.
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background/objectives To evaluate whether day-of-procedure ambient ozone exposure is associated with pneumothorax after CT-guided lung biopsy.Methods This retrospective single-centre study included 160 CT-guided lung biopsies performed between January 2018 and February 2026. Environmental data from the day of biopsy were assigned from the nearest national monitoring station. The primary outcome was any pneumothorax on post-biopsy CT; the secondary outcome was drainage-requiring pneumothorax. Multivariable logistic regression included ozone exposure, emphysema, and access route through dependent lung area (ARDA). Ozone was analysed as a continuous variable per 10 μg/m3 and, exploratorily, using a ROC-derived threshold of ≥75.8 μg/m3. Restricted cubic splines assessed nonlinearity. Sensitivity models adjusted for needle size, biopsy system, operator identity, and season. Drainage-requiring pneumothorax was analysed using Firth logistic regression.Results Pneumothorax occurred after 86 of 160 biopsies (53.8%), and 13 biopsies (8.1%) required drainage. Ozone was not associated with pneumothorax when modelled linearly (OR, 1.09 per 10 μg/m3; 95% CI, 0.97-1.23; p = 0.167). In exploratory threshold modelling, ozone ≥ 75.8 μg/m3 was associated with pneumothorax (OR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.39-5.61; p = 0.004). Emphysema increased pneumothorax odds (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.03-4.68; p = 0.047), whereas ARDA was protective (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.11-0.45; p < 0.001). Spline analysis supported nonlinearity (p = 0.001). For drainage-requiring pneumothorax, only emphysema was significant.Conclusions Ambient ozone showed an exploratory nonlinear association with pneumothorax after CT-guided lung biopsy, with a threshold signal around 70-80 μg/m3. ARDA was protective, whereas emphysema was associated with drainage-requiring pneumothorax.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Society of Interventional Radiology pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisation à but non lucratif
-
University institute of Diagnostic pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Society of Interventional Radiology et University institute of Diagnostic.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.