Predictors of First-Line Progression-Free Survival in Testicular Germ Cell Tumors: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Résumé fourni par la source
Background: Testicular germ cell tumors are usually highly responsive to platinum-based treatment. However, outcomes remain heterogeneous. This exploratory retrospective study assessed factors associated with first-line progression-free survival and with the need for second-line systemic therapy. Methods: We reviewed 41 patients treated for testicular germ cell tumors at a single oncology center. Clinical, pathological, metastatic, treatment-related, and biochemical variables were extracted from medical records. First-line progression-free survival was evaluated using exploratory univariable Cox regression. Variables associated with second-line treatment were assessed using exploratory univariable analyses. Results: The median age was 37 years and most of the patients had non-seminomatous histology. A greater mean decline of initially elevated serum markers after the first chemotherapy cycle was associated with longer first-line progression-free survival in both the overall cohort and the non-seminomatous subgroup. The need for second-line systemic treatment was associated with stage III disease, metastasis at diagnosis, and elevated baseline serum tumor markers. Conclusions: In this cohort, baseline disease burden and marker elevation were the clearest adverse clinical signals. Moreover, early marker decline may add information about treatment sensitivity and tailor follow-up.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Predictors of First-Line Progression-Free Survival in Testicular Germ Cell Tumors: A Retrospective Cohort Study
- Date Crossref
- 27/07/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.