Improving estimates of the b-value in regional catalogs by means of the the b-more-positive method
Rattachement africain : it, fr, sg. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The b-value, which controls the slope of the frequency-magnitude distribution of earthquakes, is a critical parameter in seismic forecasting. However, accurately measuring the true b-value is challenging due to the temporal and spatial variations in the completeness of instrumental seismic catalogs. In this study, we systematically compare traditional methods for estimating the b-value with newer approaches, specifically focusing on the b-more-positive estimator based on positive magnitude difference statistics. We conduct this comparison using both synthetic ETAS catalogs, with artificially introduced incompleteness, and instrumental catalogs from five regions: Japan, Italy, Southern California, Northern California, and New Zealand. Our analysis of synthetic ETAS catalogs demonstrates that traditional estimators systematically underestimate the b-value under incompleteness scenarios, whereas the b-more-positive estimator yields highly accurate results. Consistent patterns are found in instrumental catalogs, suggesting that conventional methods also underestimate the b-value in real datasets, with important implications for seismic forecasting. Moreover, the b-more-positive estimator provides robust evidence of significant differences in the b-value across the considered geographic regions.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Improving estimates of the b-value in regional catalogs by means of the the b-more-positive method
- Date Crossref
- 25/07/2026
- Éditeur
- McGill University Library and Archives
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.