Sleep Medication Use and Associated Factors Among Adults with Insomnia Symptoms: A Cross-Sectional Study in Brazil
Rattachement africain : br. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: Insomnia affects health, well-being, and productivity. Despite recommendations favoring Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) as first-line treatment, hypnotic medications remain widely used. Objective: To examine the frequency and types of sleep medications used by individuals with insomnia symptoms seeking psychological treatment, as well as factors associated with hypnotic use. Materials and Methods: The present cross-sectional study included 1,158 adults with insomnia symptoms recruited from a specialized service between 2021 and 2022. Participants completed online questionnaires assessing sociodemographic characteristics, medication use, and standardized measures of insomnia severity (Insomnia Severity Index), anxiety, and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). Descriptive analyses and multivariate logistic regression were performed. Results: < 0.001). White participants were also more likely to use hypnotics, regardless of insomnia severity. Conclusions: Pharmacological treatment remains predominant among individuals with insomnia symptoms, despite recommendations for CBT-I as the first-line treatment. These findings highlight the importance of expanding access to behavioral interventions and promoting the rational use of sleep medications in Brazil.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Sleep Medication Use and Associated Factors Among Adults with Insomnia Symptoms: A Cross-Sectional Study in Brazil
- Date Crossref
- 01/06/2026
- Éditeur
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.