Ensemble learning-based susceptibility mapping of clustered shallow landslides triggered by the May 18, 2025 rainfall in Guangdong, China
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Rainfall-induced clustered shallow landslides are difficult to predict because of their highly aggregated spatial patterns and short-duration triggering conditions. This study proposed a heterogeneous Stacking ensemble framework for landslide susceptibility assessment using 1969 shallow landslides triggered by the May 18, 2025 rainfall event in Gaozhou, Guangdong, China. Random Forest, Gradient Boosting Decision Tree, and XGBoost were used as base learners, while Logistic Regression served as the meta-learner. The Stacking model achieved the highest AUC of 0.952, outperforming RF, GBDT, and XGBoost by 5.0%, 4.0%, and 1.8%, respectively. It also identified more true positives, 542, than RF, GBDT, and XGBoost, which identified 531, 530, and 537, respectively. Susceptibility zoning and uncertainty analysis showed that the Stacking model provided more differentiated and reliable spatial predictions, with low uncertainty in low-susceptibility areas and relatively stable agreement in very-high-susceptibility zones. Feature importance analysis indicated that rainfall was the dominant factor, followed by slope and lithology. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of heterogeneous ensemble learning for clustered shallow landslide susceptibility assessment in subtropical granite regions.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Ensemble learning-based susceptibility mapping of clustered shallow landslides triggered by the May 18, 2025 rainfall in Guangdong, China
- Date Crossref
- 24/07/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.