B‐cell activating factor receptor expression in B‐lymphoblastic leukaemia: Flow cytometric analysis and implications for targeted therapy
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Cluster of differrentiation 19 (CD19)-directed therapies have significantly improved outcomes in B-cell malignancies; however, relapse driven by antigen escape remains a major clinical challenge, underscoring the need for alternative therapeutic targets. The B-cell activating factor receptor (BAFF-R), a key regulator of B-cell survival, is highly expressed in mature B-cell neoplasms, but its relevance in B-lymphoblastic leukaemia (B-ALL) remains unclear. We assessed BAFF-R expression in diagnostic and relapsed fresh B-ALL samples using multi-parameter flow cytometry. BAFF-R was consistently expressed in most cases, albeit at lower levels than in mature B cells, and expression was retained in the majority of CD19-negative relapses following CD19-directed therapy. Notably, tumor protein p53 (TP53) alterations were significantly enriched in CD19-negative immune escape disease (68.8% vs. 21.7%; p = 0.0006; OR = 7.9), yet BAFF-R expression remained preserved in this high-risk group. These findings establish BAFF-R as a stable immunotherapeutic target in B-ALL, including in CD19-negative and TP53-altered relapsed disease, and underscore its relevance amid ongoing early-phase clinical trials of BAFF-R-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- B‐cell activating factor <scp>receptor</scp> expression in B‐lymphoblastic leukaemia: Flow cytometric analysis and implications for targeted therapy
- Date Crossref
- 24/07/2026
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.