Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Assisted Reproductive Technology in Breast and Gynecologic Malignancies: Cancer Risk, Fertility Preservation, and Post-Treatment Reproductive Outcomes

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
9Institutions déclarées
3Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us, ch, fr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Assisted reproductive technology (ART) is increasingly utilized worldwide, yet concerns remain regarding its potential association with breast and gynecological malignancies and the safety of fertility-preservation strategies in cancer survivors. Ovarian stimulation exposes women to supraphysiologic hormone levels, raising questions about cancer risk, particularly for hormone-sensitive tumors. Current evidence, however, is largely reassuring. Registry-based studies and meta-analyses demonstrate no consistent increase in breast or endometrial cancer following ART, although endometrial cancer risk remains inconclusive despite large new cohorts. Cervical cancer has not been linked to ART exposure. For ovarian cancer, risk appears primarily driven by underlying infertility, parity, and endometriosis rather than ART itself, and no excess risk is observed among BRCA mutation carriers. In parallel, fertility preservation (FP) has become an integral component of gynecologic oncology care for reproductive-aged women. Strategies including cryopreservation of oocytes, embryos, or ovarian tissue, as well as fertility-sparing surgery or hormonal therapy, can be safely pursued in carefully selected early-stage cancers. Pregnancy and livebirth rates vary by diagnosis: outcomes are favorable after breast and cervical cancers, more limited in endometrial cancer due to endometrial receptivity challenges, and possible but less predictable in ovarian cancer, where stage and histology guide feasibility. Available observational evidence does not suggest a clear increase in recurrence risk among carefully selected patients, although evidence remains limited and long-term follow-up is needed. Overall, current data suggest ART is safe when individualized to patient and tumor characteristics, highlighting the importance of proactive fertility counseling, modified stimulation protocols, and multidisciplinary care to optimize oncologic and reproductive outcomes.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Assisted Reproductive Technology in Breast and Gynecologic Malignancies: Cancer Risk, Fertility Preservation, and Post-Treatment Reproductive Outcomes
Date Crossref
24/07/2026
Éditeur
MDPI AG
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Reproductive Biology and FertilityOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentOvarian function and disorders

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.