A Machine Learning Framework for Predicting Tax Payment Arrears: Comparative Model Evaluation and Shapley-Value Interpretability
Le résumé fourni par la source
Tax administrations increasingly rely on data-driven risk models to prioritize enforcement and outreach resources, yet machine learning applications to personal income tax arrears remain scarce compared with corporate-tax and fraud-detection contexts. This study introduces TaxMind, a machine learning framework for predicting tax payment arrears, operationalized as escalation to mandatory (forced) collection, comparatively evaluating five classifiers and applying Shapley-value techniques to interpret the resulting model. A dataset of 16,010 administrative tax records was cleaned by removing 5,385 exact duplicate rows (33.6% of raw data), yielding 10,625 records across 9,264 taxpayers; a taxpayer-grouped train/test split prevented information leakage between related observations. Decision Tree, Random Forest, XGBoost, Support Vector Machine, and a Multi-Layer Perceptron were trained on eight demographic and fiscal attributes, with a signed-logarithm transformation correcting skew in the tax-amount field; interpretability was assessed using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). XGBoost achieved the best discrimination (AUC = 0.779, accuracy = 70.2%, F1 = 0.699), outperforming the other models compared. SHAP identified tax amount, tax category, and taxpayer age, a socio-demographic attribute, as dominant predictors, diverging from gain-based rankings. These findings indicate that duplicate contamination and non-grouped validation can distort administrative model evaluations, and that debtor-related attributes carry under-exploited predictive value for tax segmentation.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A Machine Learning Framework for Predicting Tax Payment Arrears: Comparative Model Evaluation and Shapley-Value Interpretability
- Date Crossref
- 23/07/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.