Changes in resilience and masculine gender role stress following 8 weeks of maximal power cycling training in male university students: a single-group pre-post study

Le résumé fourni par la source

Male university students commonly experience gender role stress derived from traditional masculine norms, yet there is a lack of targeted and acceptable psychological interventions for this population. High-intensity interval training, given its time efficiency and alignment with masculine values, may represent a potential strategy to improve resilience and alleviate gender role stress. This study aimed to examine the effects of an 8-week maximal power cycling intervention on resilience and gender role stress in male university students. Using a single-group pre-post design, 54 male university students were enrolled and underwent 8 weeks of Wingate sprint interval training (4 × 30-s all-out sprints, 4-min rest intervals, 2–3 sessions per week). Resilience (CD-RISC-10), masculine gender role stress (abbreviated MGRS), and rating of fatigue (ROF) were measured before and after the intervention. Paired t -tests, correlation analyses, and exploratory mediation analyses were conducted. Results showed that peak cycling power ( p = 0.0007) and duration ( p = 0.0018) significantly increased, resilience significantly improved ( p = 0.0039), and gender role stress ( p = 0.0150) and rating of fatigue ( p < 0.001) significantly decreased. Exploratory mediation analysis revealed no significant indirect effect of resilience on the relationship between power improvement and gender role stress reduction (95% CI included 0). Of note, because all variables entered the model as change scores (Δ) in this single-group pre-post design, the temporal precedence requirement for formal mediation analysis could not be met; thus, these findings are exploratory and should not be interpreted as causal. Under this single-group pre-post design, significant improvements in resilience and reductions in gender role stress were observed after the 8-week intervention, but these changes warrant cautious interpretation. Due to the lack of a control group, the results should be considered preliminary and exploratory, and causality cannot be established. Moreover, the mechanism does not appear to operate through a mediating pathway of resilience, it may involve more complex psychological processes such as behavioral activation and cognitive restructuring of fatigue.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.