Reading Between the Lines: Forward Modeling Dust, Continuum, and Spectral Cleaning for Multi-Line Intensity Mapping
Le résumé fourni par la source
Line intensity mapping (LIM) offers a tomographic view of galaxy evolution by measuring the aggregate emission from unresolved galaxies. In the optical and near-infrared, the line emission is accompanied by much brighter continuum emission that must be removed to recover line auto- and cross-power spectra. We develop a forward-modeling framework using a $\sim2$deg$^2$ lightcone drawn from a cosmological $N$-body simulation populated with galaxies using a physics-based semi-analytic model (SAM). We construct intensity maps for the stellar continuum and for the strongest optical lines, H$α$, H$β$, [O III] $\lambda5007$, and [O II] $\lambda3727$, including nebular dust attenuation tied to galaxy properties. From these cubes, we measure cross-channel angular power spectra, $C_\ell(λ_i,λ_j)$, and the normalized correlation matrix $r_{ij}$. In line-only maps, the correlation matrices show same-redshift ridges between emission lines, demonstrating how multi-line intensity mapping (MLIM) can isolate large-scale structure and probe dust attenuation. We show that dust suppresses the line cross-power by an amount that depends on galaxy properties, wavelength, and line pair, so a single overall amplitude cannot capture its effect. In total maps, however, the continuum dominates the raw correlations and hides much of the line-ridge structure. We therefore apply principal component analysis (PCA)-based spectral cleaning and quantify the line-transfer function using the simulation truth. Removing 20 PCA modes gives the best trade-off between line recovery and continuum suppression in our mock maps. Our results demonstrate the promise and challenges of extracting dust-sensitive LIM observables from SPHEREx-like observations, and highlight the need to model continuum cleaning and its transfer function in quantitative inference pipelines.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.