Predictor of Mortality in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Results of Explainable Deep Learning-Based Survival Analysis from a 15-Year Follow-Up
Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a respiratory disorder with comorbidities of several nature, from cardiovascular to renal ones. OSA is typically treated through continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), but more investigations are needed to confirm its benefits. Methods: In this work, survival analysis has been exploited and enhanced with eXplainable Artifical Intelligence (XAI) to investigate the impact of comorbidities and compare the model reliability. The dataset encompasses both clinical and polysomnography-based data for a total of 45 different features. Results: A total of 1,394 OSA patients followed for 15 years were enrolled. All the selected features have been studied by means of DL-models and time-dependent XAI techniques. The variables impacting on mortality are reported below in descending order with respect their importance: (1) age, years of CPAP, renal dysfunction, COPD, body mass index categories, sex, and anemia for the CoxTime; (2) age, apnea hypopnea index, renal dysfunction, SaO2 min, years of CPAP, COPD, and anemia for the LogHazard. Conclusion: Advancing age, severity of OSA, comorbidity, including chronic kidney disease, COPD, and anemia, are crucial contributors to increased mortality.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Predictor of Mortality in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Results of Explainable Deep Learning-Based Survival Analysis from a 15-Year Follow-Up
- Date Crossref
- 23/07/2026
- Éditeur
- S. Karger AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.