Life on UNESCO Heritage: Modelling Lichen Colonization on an Armenian Cross-Stone (Khachkar)

Résumé fourni par la source

This study investigates lichen colonisation on a medieval basalt Armenian cross-stone (khachkar) in the Noratus cemetery, the largest extant concentration of memorial khachkars in Armenia, integrating fine-scale vegetation sampling, microhabitat assessment, and multivariate analysis. A preliminary survey of c. 30 cross-stones confirmed that the selected one was representative of the site. Thirty-six evenly spaced relevés of 10 cm2 were recorded across the surface, with lichens identified macroscopically in situ and supported by laboratory-verified reference material from outside the protected area. Microhabitat descriptors were recorded, and ecological preferences were assessed using indicator values. The main environmental drivers at Noratus appear to be high solar irradiation, pronounced aridity and especially elevated nutrient deposition. Numerical classification and ordination revealed three main lichen communities, structured primarily by micro-scale water availability, exposure, and nutrient enrichment, which occupy different portions of the monument. The absence of endolithic lichens, together with the dry–cold climate of Noratus and the resistance of basalt to bioweathering, suggests limited structural impact. However, pronounced chromatic alteration was observed, producing a characteristic polychromy on the cross-stones. Lichen removal is likely to be problematic due to the extent of the cemetery, the prevalence of vegetative reproduction, and rapid recolonisation of nitrophilous species. This is the first study ever carried out on lichen colonisation of Armenian cross-stones, which are inscribed on the UNESCO List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity. The results provide a baseline for future monitoring and support a conservation approach balancing material risk assessment with aesthetic considerations.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.