Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 preprint

Oscillometry in Chronic Respiratory Diseases: From Standardization to Clinical Adoption

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
13Institutions déclarées
4Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : es, gb, us, ro. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Objective: Oscillometry is a lung function technique that has gained increasing interest because of its sensitivity to small airway dysfunction. Despite growing attention, important challenges still limit widespread clinical adoption. The current study aims to advance in Oscillometry analysis and reporting to improve repeatability, interpretability, and clinical applicability. Methods: Oscillometry, forced spirometry, and symptoms were measured at three time points, over a median follow-up of 602 days, in 170 patients with COPD (n=89, 52%), asthma (n=59, 35%), and bronchiectasis (n=22, 13%). We investigated: (1) intra-breath analysis; (2) several modelling strategies to derive a single oscillometry score for routine clinical interpretation; and (3) intra-individual variability. Outcomes were evaluated across three clinical scenarios: bronchodilator response, longitudinal follow-up, and exacerbations. Results: Intra-breath differences between inspiratory and expiratory phases (ΔX5 and ΔAX) reflected respiratory hysteresis but had poor repeatability (daily CoV: 200% and 70%, respectively). Resistance-related variables (R5, R5–20) showed lower sensitivity than reactance-related indices (AX, X5, Fres). An AX-based calibrated oscillometry score (AX-OS) provided the best index among the candidate models evaluated. AX-OS had higher repeatability (CoV 19%) than conventional oscillometry variables, and good clinical responsiveness across the three clinical scenarios assessed. Moreover, AX-OS showed potential for contributing to enhanced community-managed exacerbations through a hybrid care intervention. Conclusions: The findings support: (1) well-defined strategies to reduce intra-session variability, particularly through optimization of AX-derived measures; and (2) simplified clinical reporting approaches. AX-OS may improve interpretability and longitudinal assessment; however, independent validation in larger multicentre cohorts is needed before routine clinical applicability. Trial registration: NCT06421402. Keywords: forced oscillation technique; small airway; COPD; asthma; repeatability; biomarkers; respiratory mechanics.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

La source scientifique ouverte est momentanément indisponible.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchAsthma and respiratory diseasesDelphi Technique in Research

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.