Blocking interleukin-1 in pericarditis: Should we move earlier and stronger?
Résumé fourni par la source
Acute pericarditis is generally a benign condition, yet 15-30% of patients will develop recurrent pericarditis. Standard first-line therapy combines non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or aspirin with colchicine, which reduces but does not eliminate the risk of recurrence. Patients presenting with a high inflammatory burden, subacute evolution or large pericardial effusion are particularly prone to recurrence, and corticosteroid exposure - still frequent in clinical practice - further increases this risk. Over the last decade, the central role of interleukin-1 (IL-1) in pericardial inflammation has been demonstrated, and IL-1 inhibitors have emerged as the most effective treatment for colchicine-resistant or corticosteroid-dependent recurrent pericarditis. Anakinra, rilonacept and other IL-1-targeting agents provide rapid symptom resolution and dramatically reduce recurrences, thereby transforming the management of difficult-to-treat forms of the disease. This review summarizes current knowledge on the IL-1 pathway in pericarditis and examines whether earlier, targeted intervention could modify disease trajectory, particularly in patients identified as having a high risk of recurrence at presentation. Drawing parallels with Still's disease, in which early IL-1 inhibition improves long-term outcomes, these data support the need for high-quality trials evaluating IL-1 blockade as a first-line strategy in selected patients with acute pericarditis.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Blocking interleukin-1 in pericarditis: Should we move earlier and stronger?
- Date Crossref
- 01/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.