Whole-Body Vibration After Compressive Spinal Cord-Injury in Rats Restores Dorsal Horn Synaptic Relations and Alleviates Pain-Associated Behavior

Le résumé fourni par la source

Spinal cord injury (SCI) induces neuronal loss and demyelination, leading to maladaptive neuronal circuits that drive persistent central neuropathic pain (PCNP). While pharmacological, psychological, and physiotherapeutic approaches have been applied, including whole-body vibration (WBV), synaptic-level mechanisms of WBV remain largely unexplored. Here, we assessed the post-SCI pain-associated behavior index (PAB, based on established behavioral criteria) and compared synapse counts (SYN+, VGLUT1+, ChAT+, VGAT+), CGRP+- and SER+-structures, as well as astrocytic and microglial populations in the lumbar dorsal horn following thoracic SCI in WBV-treated and untreated rats. Animals received WBV from postoperative week 3 to 12, and outcomes were compared with non-treated controls. PAB was consistently reduced in WBV-treated animals. STED-microscopy quantification showed that WBV increased the linear density of VGAT + and VGLUT1 + perisomatic terminals, as well as the number of SER + fibers. Conversely, WBV reduced CGRP + structures in the dorsal horn, decreased the density of CGRP + perisomatic and axo-axonic synapses, and lowered astrocytic and microglial populations. Our data indicate that the WBV-induced frequent (15-30 Hz) muscle contractions and proprioceptive impulses contribute to spasticity modulation (via VGAT-related mechanisms) and attenuation of post-SCI hyperalgesia (CGRP-associated). Together with the reduced astro- and microglia amounts, the described synaptic alterations are considered essential prerequisites for better motor recovery. These findings provide preclinical evidence for the functional benefits of WBV in an animal SCI model and warrant further investigations to determine mechanisms underpinning this non-invasive, low-cost and easily applicable rehabilitation approach.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.