A preclinical resistance framework discovers the virulence risks of antibiotics in development
Rattachement africain : hu, ru. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Several new antibiotics target multidrug-resistant pathogens, yet resistance is still evaluated mainly by drug-susceptibility, leaving consequences for bacterial pathogenicity poorly understood. Here, we develop a framework integrating resistance evolution, genomic surveillance and host–pathogen phenotyping to classify antibiotics by resistance potential and pathogenic consequences. Applying this framework to Klebsiella pneumoniae identified functionally distinct antibiotic candidates associated with elevated virulence risk. Resistance evolution rapidly increased virulence through clinically-relevant mutations, without direct selection for pathogenicity. Despite distinct genetic routes, resistance converged on cell-envelope rewiring. A single resistance mutation increased epithelial adhesion, intracellular colonization, macrophage immune-evasion, and tissue persistence in murine infection models, transforming K. pneumoniae into a more invasive and cytotoxic pathogen. Risk-profile analysis revealed partial decoupling of resistance and pathogenicity, with some low-resistance antibiotics yielding highly-virulent populations. These findings establish resistance-driven virulence as an underappreciated translational hazard and call for incorporating host–pathogen interactions into resistance surveillance and preclinical antibiotic development.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A preclinical resistance framework discovers the virulence risks of antibiotics in development
- Date Crossref
- 21/07/2026
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.