Dose-response relationship of mancozeb exposure on follicle-stimulating hormone and sperm morphology in Sprague Dawley rats
Rattachement africain : kr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Agricultural pesticides constitute a growing concern for male reproductive health, with dithiocarbamate fungicides implicated in endocrine disruption through multiple pathways. This research examined the dose-response relationship between mancozeb exposure and follicle-stimulating hormone alterations alongside sperm morphological changes in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Thirty-two adult male rats were divided into four groups receiving vehicle control, 25, 50, or 100 mg/kg mancozeb daily for 45 days via oral gavage. Serum FSH was measured by radioimmunoassay, and sperm morphology was evaluated on Papanicolaou-stained smears. Mancozeb administration produced a dose-dependent elevation in serum FSH concentrations from 3.2 ± 0.4 mIU/mL in controls to 9.8 ± 1.2 mIU/mL in the high-dose group (p < 0.001). Concurrently, the proportion of morphologically normal spermatozoa decreased from 89.3 ± 3.1% to 38.7 ± 4.8%. A significant negative correlation was established between FSH elevation and normal sperm morphology (r = ?0.88, p < 0.001), suggesting a mechanistic link between gonadotropin dysregulation and spermatogenic failure. These results demonstrate that mancozeb exposure disrupts the FSH-mediated regulation of spermatogenesis, resulting in progressive deterioration of sperm structural integrity.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Dose-response relationship of mancozeb exposure on follicle-stimulating hormone and sperm morphology in Sprague Dawley rats
- Date Crossref
- 01/05/2026
- Éditeur
- AkiNik Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.