Aller au contenu principal
2026 article

Pain neuroscience education versus spinal physiology and ergonomics education in multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: 12-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : ch, fr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background Pain neuroscience education (PNE) combined with active rehabilitation has been shown to improve outcomes in chronic low back pain; however, its comparative effectiveness with other educational approaches within multidisciplinary rehabilitation programs remains unclear, particularly over longer follow-up periods.Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of pain neuroscience education compared with spinal physiology and ergonomics education(SPEE) within a one-week multidisciplinary rehabilitation program for patients with chronic low back pain at 12-month follow-up.Methods This study reports the 12-month follow-up of a previously published randomized controlled trial. Eighty-eight patients were randomized to the PNE group (n = 44) or the SPEE group (n = 44). Outcomes included disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire), pain intensity, fear-avoidance beliefs, kinesiophobia (17-item Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia [TSK-17]), pain catastrophizing, and anxiety-depression, assessed at baseline, post-intervention, 3 months, and 12 months.Results All analyses were done among all randomized patients who had not withdrawn before the start of the rehabilitation program (D0) according to the allocated group to which they were assigned at randomization (n = 74). The between-group difference in disability between baseline and 12 months was not statistically significant (mean difference, −1.04; 95 CI%, −3.14 to 1.06; p = .33). The between-group difference in TSK-17 score significantly favored the PNE group at 12 months(−3.97;95%CI, −7.36 to −0.58; p = .022). No significant between-group differences were observed for pain, pain catastrophizing, anxiety, depression or patient satisfaction.Conclusion At 12 months, PNE improves kinesiophobia scores more than SPEE within a short multidisciplinary rehabilitation program, but does not confer benefits for pain catastrophizing or disability in patients with chronic low back pain.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04179708.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Pain neuroscience education versus spinal physiology and ergonomics education in multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: 12-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial
Date Crossref
22/07/2026
Éditeur
Informa UK Limited
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationOccupational Health and PerformanceSpinal Cord Injury Research

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.