Evaluating the Sustained Impact of a Virtual Rounding Queue Software on Family-Centered Rounding
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Family-centered rounds improve communication, safety, and satisfaction, but implementation efforts have fallen short. A pilot study using a novel virtual rounding software, Q-rounds, demonstrated improved stakeholder participation. This study assessed sustainability and adaptability across time and rounding models. We hypothesized sustained improvement in family and nursing engagement without prolonging rounding time. METHODS: This pre-post observational study was performed 2 years after Q-rounds implementation in a level IV neonatal intensive care unit. Rounding encounters were observed for a table-rounding team and a walk-rounding team. Data were collected on nurse and family presence, mode of attendance, and rounding duration. Between-group comparisons were made to assess adaptability. To assess sustainability, longitudinal comparisons were made between the contemporary table-rounding cohort and 2 historical table-rounding cohorts, before and 6 weeks after Q-rounds implementation. RESULTS: Family presence during rounds remained elevated at 54% at 2 years relative to 18% pre-implementation (P < 0.001) driven by virtual participation. Nurse presence for the entirety of rounds remained considerably higher at 55% at 2 years relative to 12% pre-implementation (P < 0.001). Rounding duration remained similar. The 2 contemporary cohorts (table-rounding and walk-rounding) demonstrated similar family presence (54% vs 58%, P = 0.39), but the walk-rounding cohort demonstrated higher in-person family attendance (51% vs 32%, P = 0.007) and a higher proportion of nurses present for the entirety of rounds (81% vs 55%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A virtual rounding queue software was associated with sustained improvements in family and nurse engagement without prolonging rounds with positive results in 2 distinct rounding contexts.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Evaluating the Sustained Impact of a Virtual Rounding Queue Software on Family-Centered Rounding
- Date Crossref
- 23/07/2026
- Éditeur
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Fairview Health Services pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
University of Minnesota Medical Center pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Southern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
-
University of Minnesota System pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Illinois College pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Peoria campus of the University of Illinois System pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Minneapolis pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
Clinical and Translational Science Institute — University of Minnesota, Fairview Health Services et University of Minnesota Medical Center, avec 5 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.