Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia: Insights from a Portuguese tertiary centre cohort
Résumé fourni par la source
Introduction Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD) is a rare genetic disorder caused by defective ciliary structure and function, leading to chronic respiratory and systemic manifestations. Diagnostic pathways have evolved over time, but no single standalone test exists.Methods Retrospective study of PCD patients followed at a Portuguese tertiary hospital, between 2001–2024.Results Thirty-five patients with a confirmed diagnosis were included: 13 children and 22 adults. Median age at diagnosis was 7 years (0–16) in children and 38.5 years (12–64) in adults. Time to diagnosis decreased over the years, coinciding with a shift in the hierarchy of methods from high-speed video microscopy and transmission electron microscopy to genetic testing. The most frequent mutations were DNAH5 (31.3%) and DNAH11 (12.5%). Pulmonary function tended to be better in children (p = 0.085), whereas bronchiectasis were more extensive and bilateral in adults (p = 0.044 and p = 0.002, respectively). Children more frequently received treatment with hypertonic saline (p = 0.003) and adults with bronchodilators (p = 0.035). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was only identified in adults; inhaled antibiotics were only prescribed in this age group (18.2%).Conclusion This represents the largest Portuguese cohort to date and provides relevant clinical and diagnostic insight into age-related differences, supporting the importance of early detection and intervention to limit lung damage.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia: Insights from a Portuguese tertiary centre cohort
- Date Crossref
- 21/07/2026
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.