Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Dose or Timing? The Role of Prophylaxis in Preventing Joint Bleeds in Hemophilia: A Cross-Generational Comparative Analysis

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : tr, de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess intergenerational differences in joint health and functional independence among adults with hemophilia and to examine the relationship between prophylaxis timing, dose intensity, and treatment adherence and long-term joint outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted including 91 adult patients with hemophilia A or B. Participants were classified into generational cohorts within different treatment eras. Joint health and functional status were assessed using the Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) and the Functional Independence Score in Hemophilia (FISH). Statistical analyses included correlation analyses, subgroup comparisons, and general linear models; subgroup analyses were considered exploratory. RESULTS: The median age was 38 years, and prophylaxis was initiated at a median age of 27 years. Patients had a mean annual bleeding rate of 11.1, with a median of 2 joints affected per year, most commonly the ankles, knees, and elbows. The median prophylaxis dose was 20.8 IU/kg, and bleeding episodes significantly decreased in patients requiring dose escalation (P = .007). Higher joint scores were associated with poorer functional outcomes and a greater number of bleeding joints. Joint health and functional outcomes differed significantly across generations (P < .001), with worse outcomes in older cohorts. Follow-up showed no significant improvement over 1 year, although baseline and follow-up joint scores were strongly correlated (P < .001). CONCLUSION: In adults with hemophilia, delayed prophylaxis initiation was associated with poorer joint and functional outcomes. The observed intergenerational differences likely reflect historical variations in access to prophylaxis and treatment practices. Although individualized dose escalation improved bleeding control, established joint damage showed limited short-term reversibility. Cite this article as: Demirci Z, Soyer N, Keklik Karadağ F, Arslan A, Saydam G, Şahin F. Dose or timing? The role of prophylaxis in preventing joint bleeds in hemophilia: a cross-generational comparative analysis. Eurasian J Med. 2026, 58(4), 1208, doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2026.251208.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Dose or Timing? The Role of Prophylaxis in Preventing Joint Bleeds in Hemophilia: A Cross-Generational Comparative Analysis
Date Crossref
16/07/2026
Éditeur
AVES YAYINCILIK A.Ş.
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Hemophilia Treatment and ResearchBlood transfusion and managementBlood properties and coagulation

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.