Stable reduction of upper cervical spinal cord area in cervical dystonia
Résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: While cervical dystonia (CD) is predominantly viewed as a disorder of brain-based motor network dysfunction, chronic dystonic head and neck posturing may affect the upper cervical spinal cord, a structure that has been largely overlooked, partly due to the lack of imaging protocols optimized for the craniovertebral junction. OBJECTIVE: To assess cross-sectional area (CA) and cord eccentricity (CE) of the upper cervical spinal cord at C1-C3 in patients with CD, compared with healthy controls (HC), and to examine their longitudinal stability over a period of 6.2 years. METHODS: 37 patients with CD and 38 age- and sex-matched HC underwent 3T MRI with T1-weighted structural brain imaging covering the upper cervical spinal cord (C1-C3). CA and CE at C1-C3 were quantified using an automated ENIGMA-based spinal cord pipeline. Cross-sectional group differences were tested and longitudinal change was evaluated in 26 patients re-imaged after a mean follow-up of 6.2 years (Range: 2.1 - 11.9). RESULTS: , p = .048), while CA at C1 and CE measures at all levels did not differ. No longitudinal decline of CA was observed in CD patients over a period of 6.2 years (Range: 2.1 - 11.9). CONCLUSION: CD is associated with stable reductions in upper CA at C2-C3 with no evidence of further decline over the observed follow-up period. These findings support the interpretation of a secondary structural adaptation related to chronic abnormal head-neck biomechanics, rather than a primary or progressive spinal cord pathology.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Stable reduction of upper cervical spinal cord area in cervical dystonia
- Date Crossref
- 01/09/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.