Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Recommendations from Latin American Experts Consensus on Surgical Strategy, Urinary Reconstruction, and Oncological and Func-tional Outcomes.
Rattachement africain : br, us, pa, es, cl, ar. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
PURPOSE: To develop contemporary evidence-informed recommendations for robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC), urinary reconstruction, and perioperative management, integrating current evidence with the experience of Latin American experts in uro-oncology and robotic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A modified Delphi consensus process was conducted involving 42 experts with extensive experience in RARC. Topics included patient selection, perioperative optimization, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), lymph node dissection, urinary reconstruction, functional preservation, perioperative systemic therapy, complex clinical scenarios, and emerging robotic technologies. A comprehensive literature review was performed using Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science through November 2025, following PRISMA principles and incorporating recommendations from EAU, AUA/ASCO/SUO, and NCCN guidelines. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement. RESULTS: Consensus supported routine implementation of ERAS protocols, structured frailty and nutritional assessment, extended pelvic lymph node dissection, and perioperative systemic therapy in eligible patients. Intracorporeal urinary diversion was associated with improved recovery and lower wound-related morbidity. Nerve-sparing and organ-preserving approaches were recommended in selected patients to optimize continence, sexual function, and quality of life. Orthotopic neobladder reconstruction should be individualized according to oncologic safety, functional status, renal function, and patient preference. RARC was considered feasible in complex settings, including obesity, bulky lymphadenopathy, locally advanced disease, and salvage surgery, when performed in experienced high-volume centers. Areas without consensus included urinary drainage strategies and antibiotic prophylaxis duration. CONCLUSIONS: This expert consensus provides recommendations for RARC and urinary reconstruction, aiming to standardize practice, optimize perioperative care, and improve oncological and functional outcomes. Future prospective studies are needed.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Wake Forest University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Hospital do Coração pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Hospital Felício Rocho pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Hospital Sírio-Libanês pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Real Hospital Português pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
AC Camargo Hospital pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Hospital Punta Pacifica pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Faculdade de Medicina do ABC pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Hospital Geral de Fortaleza pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Puigvert Foundation pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisation à but non lucratif
-
Instituto Nacional de Câncer - INCA pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais, Wake Forest University et Hospital do Coração, avec 9 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.