Multi-omics prediction for yellow rust in bread and durum wheat through conventional and Ai-based frameworks

Résumé fourni par la source

Yellow rust (YR) is a major threat to both bread and durum wheat production, often causing substantial yield losses. Conventional visual scoring of YR severity, while widely adopted, is labor-intensive, time-consuming, and prone to human error. In this study, we evaluated the predictability (PA), defined as the correlation between predicted and observed values, using genomic and phenomic data for YR severity under multiple prediction scenarios in two biparental wheat populations (bread and durum). YR scoring was conducted on two dates, with YR severity visually assessed while unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based high-throughput phenotyping (HTP) data were collected using a multispectral camera. HTP data were processed to extract spectral wavelengths and vegetation indices (VIs), and all lines were also genotyped using SNP arrays. We tested a diverse set of models, including parametric, machine learning, and deep learning approaches. PA increased markedly when HTP-derived data were used compared with genomic markers alone. For example, support vector regression (SVR) improved from 0.35 (markers only) to 0.87 (wavelengths only). However, integrating genomic and phenomic data did not yield further improvements, as models often plateaued when using HTP-derived features alone. Cross-crop prediction demonstrated promising generalization across bread and durum wheat, achieving PA values up to 0.83. For this last task, best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) and multilayer perception (MLP) consistently provided robust performance across scenarios. These findings highlight the strong potential of UAV-based HTP for rapid, scalable, and accurate prediction of YR severity in wheat. While genomics retains broad utility for breeding, the practical integration of phenomics and AI-driven prediction pipelines will ultimately depend on breeding program strategies, resources, and objectives.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.