Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

The COVID-19 Pandemic and Changes in Cancer Screening Disparities from 2015 to 2023: An NSHAP Survey Study

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: From 1990 to 2020, cancer screening rates in the United States steadily rose, but disparities persisted. Cancer screening was disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, possibly worsening disparities. OBJECTIVE: We utilized a longitudinal cohort of age-eligible adults to examine pre-pandemic (2015-16) and late-pandemic (2021-23) cancer screening rates to evaluate health disparities. DESIGN: This is a study of participants who completed National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (NSHAP) surveys in 2015-16 and 2021-23. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to measure differences by age, gender, race and ethnicity, education level, marital status, and income in screening for colorectal, prostate and breast cancer. PARTICIPANTS: We studied data from 2,585 NSHAP participants who completed both surveys. MAIN MEASURES: Self-reported past-year colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer screening rates completed with colonoscopies, mammograms, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, respectively. KEY RESULTS: The proportion of respondents completing colonoscopies, mammograms, and PSA testing did not change across surveys. Younger individuals (aged < 60) had lower mammogram rates in 2015-16 (52.8% vs. 62.9%, p = 0.04) and lower PSA testing in both surveys (37.0% vs. 53.5%, p < 0.001 and 34.3% vs. 45.3%, p = 0.04). Hispanic respondents had the lowest colonoscopy screening rates in 2015-16 (12.1%, p = 0.006) and 2021-23 (7.6%, p = 0.002), and Black women had the highest for mammograms in 2015-16 (65.3%, p = 0.04). Non-partnered men had lower PSA testing than partnered men in both surveys (p = 0.02 and p = 0.005). All screening rates were lower for those with lower incomes in 2015-16 (p < 0.05 for all). Analyses did not show significant demographic differences in screening rates over time. CONCLUSIONS: Overall population cancer screening rates remained consistent from 2015-16 to 2021-23. Demographic differences in cancer screening rates persisted, with no subgroups disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Targeted outreach is needed for demographic subgroups such as Hispanic individuals with persistently low colorectal cancer screening rates.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
The COVID-19 Pandemic and Changes in Cancer Screening Disparities from 2015 to 2023: An NSHAP Survey Study
Date Crossref
16/07/2026
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • University of Chicago Department of Public Health Sciences pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Chicago Department of Public Health pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisme public
  • Pritzker School of Medicine pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure

Department of Public Health Sciences — University of Chicago, Chicago Department of Public Health et Pritzker School of Medicine.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

COVID-19 and healthcare impactsGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningColorectal Cancer Screening and Detection

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.