Asciminib monotherapy in patients with BCR::ABL1 T315I-mutated chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: phase 1 trial final results
Résumé fourni par la source
Abstract In chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP), BCR::ABL1 T315I commonly leads to treatment resistance, worse patient outcomes, and limited subsequent treatment options. By targeting the ABL1 myristoyl pocket, asciminib maintains activity against BCR::ABL1 T315I . We report final long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy results with asciminib in 48 patients with T315I-mutated CML-CP who received asciminib 200 mg twice daily in the phase 1, nonrandomized trial (NCT02081378). After a median exposure of 3.5 years, 52.1% of patients continued to receive asciminib via posttrial access. Of 45 evaluable patients, 24 (53.3%) achieved major molecular response (MMR); 20 of 24 maintained or deepened their response by the cutoff. The Kaplan-Meier estimated proportion of patients maintaining their first MMR for at least 144 weeks (2.8 years) was 86% (95% CI: 71.9–100.0%). The safety profile showed no new or worsening safety signals. With 1.4 years’ additional exposure since the previous analysis, the incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) (60.4%) did not increase. Four patients (8.3%) discontinued due to AEs. The exposure-adjusted incidence rate of first all-grade AOEs was 4.4 cases per 100 patient-years. With up to approximately 6 years of exposure, this final analysis confirms asciminib as a treatment option for patients with T315I-mutated CML-CP.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Asciminib monotherapy in patients with BCR::ABL1 T315I-mutated chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: phase 1 trial final results
- Date Crossref
- 16/07/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.