Association of periodontal condition with insulin sensitivity – results of the Oulu1935 cohort study
Rattachement africain : fi. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether baseline periodontal condition predicts reduced insulin sensitivity (RIS) over a follow-up period of about 15 years among participants with baseline euglycemia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A subpopulation (n = 224) of the Oulu1935 cohort was studied. Periodontal condition was defined by the presence and number of sites with periodontal pockets (probing pocket depth ≥ 4 mm) or by the participant being edentulous. Insulin sensitivity was measured using the Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index, with the lowest tertile indicating RIS. Rate ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using Poisson regression models with a robust error variance. RESULTS: RIS was observed in 21.3% of the dentate participants without periodontal pockets, 32.8% of those with 1-6 sites with pockets, 33.3% of those with ≥ 7 sites with pockets, and 40.8% of the edentulous participants. Furthermore, adjusted RRs with 95% CIs (in parentheses) for the association of periodontal condition with RIS (reference: dentate participants without periodontal pockets) were 1.4 (0.8-2.6), 1.1 (0.6-2.1), and 1.4 (0.8-2.7), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Poor periodontal condition and edentulousness predicted RIS. A healthy periodontium appears to support normal insulin function, but further studies are needed.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Association of periodontal condition with insulin sensitivity – results of the Oulu1935 cohort study
- Date Crossref
- 16/07/2026
- Éditeur
- MJS Publishing, Medical Journals Sweden AB
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.