Proteomics of Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Primary Cells of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Patients Identifies Ribosomal Proteins Associated with Survival
Résumé fourni par la source
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains a formidable clinical challenge, with a very poor survival rate. It is highly metastatic and quickly exhibits chemoresistance, both of which are mediated by interactions of the tumor cells with their microenvironment. Extracellular vesicles are key mediators by which tumor cells interact with their microenvironment. Here, we utilized a data-independent acquisition proteomics workflow to characterize the protein cargo of extracellular vesicles isolated from patient-derived primary cells and cell lines of varying aggressiveness. Mapping 1432 unique proteins with high reproducibility, we identified protein signatures that robustly discriminated between short-term and long-term survival phenotypes. While the data set was highly enriched for established exosomal markers, differential expression and PLS-DA modeling revealed that the most significant indicators of short survival (high aggressiveness) were ribosomal proteins. STRING analysis confirmed these as highly connected interactome hubs. These findings suggest that the differential loading of translational machinery into the extracellular space─likely via microvesicles or coisolated nonvesicular particles─contributes to poor prognosis, offering new insights into the systemic secretome of aggressive tumors.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Proteomics of Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Primary Cells of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Patients Identifies Ribosomal Proteins Associated with Survival
- Date Crossref
- 16/07/2026
- Éditeur
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.