Early warning scores for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with acute aortic dissection
Résumé fourni par la source
Objective: To evaluate the prognostic value of early warning score (EWS) in predicting in-hospital mortality among patients with acute aortic dissection (AAD). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients diagnosed with AAD who presented to the emergency department between January 1 and December 31, 2022. Collected data included demographic information, clinical characteristics, EWS, laboratory findings, and time to computed tomography angiography (CTA). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for in-hospital mortality. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to dissection type (A vs. B). Results: < 0.05). Multivariable analysis identified Type A AAD and surgical intervention as independent predictors of mortality. Subgroup analysis showed that among patients with Type A AAD, age, surgical treatment, and shorter time to CTA remained independently associated with in-hospital mortality. NEWS demonstrated the highest discriminative performance among the three EWS (AUC = 0.581, 95% CI 0.528-0.634), although its overall predictive ability was modest. Conclusion: NEWS demonstrated the highest discriminative performance among the evaluated EWS and may serve as a useful tool for initial risk stratification in patients with AAD. Type A AAD and surgical treatment were the only independent predictors of in-hospital mortality, highlighting the importance of timely surgical intervention for improving patient outcomes.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Early warning scores for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with acute aortic dissection
- Date Crossref
- 13/07/2026
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.