Pervasive HIV recombination limits the utility of circulating recombinant form nomenclature

Résumé fourni par la source

The naming of HIV-1 circulating recombinant forms (CRFs)-descendent viruses from the same intersubtype recombination events, is along with the designation of 'subtypes' and 'groups', routinely used to track HIV-1 diversity. However, we argue that continuing to designate all detected CRFs as distinct entities is biologically unjustified, as many represent recombinants of limited epidemiological significance. Indeed, the mechanistic underpinning of HIV-1 recombination highlights the arbitrary nature of naming these incidental recombinants, the majority of which are rarely detected again. This underlines the need to prioritise taxonomically meaningful clades, with a focus on biological significance such as emergence events associated with significant epidemiological spread, phenotypic properties or transmission advantage.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.