Aller au contenu principal
2026 article

Robotic intracorporeal modified Bordeaux versus Padua ileal bladder: head-to-head surgical technique, perioperative and functional outcomes

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : my, it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion (iUD) has facilitated the development of several orthotopic neobladder (ON) configurations. However, comparative evidence between iON types remains limited. This study aimed to provide a head-to-head comparison between modified Bordeaux Neobladder (mBN) and Padua Ileal Bladder (PIB) in terms of surgical technique, perioperative outcomes and functional results.METHODS: We prospectively analyzed patients from an IRB-approved database undergoing RARC with totally iON reconstruction between January 2022 and July 2025. Eligible patients had muscle-invasive bladder cancer or BCG-refractory high-grade NMIBC and received either mBN or PIB reconstruction by a single experienced robotic surgical team. Outcomes included operative time, transfusion rates, perioperative and early postoperative complications, diversion-related morbidity and continence recovery assessed through 3-day voiding diaries. Continuous variables were compared with Student’s t-test, while categorical variables with χ2 Fisher’s Exact Tests. Functional recovery was compared via Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank tests. A two-sided P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were included (38 mBN; 41 PIB). Baseline characteristics were comparable. Operative time (286±45 vs. 297±33 min; P=0.18), transfusion rates (11% vs. 17%; P=0.31) and hospital stay (7±7 vs. 6±3 days; P=0.41) showed no significant differences. Perioperative and 30-day complication rates were similar, as were 90-day outcomes. Uretero-ileal leakages (3% vs. 12%; P=0.12) and strictures (11% vs. 12%; P=1.00) occurred infrequently in both groups. Day- and night-time continence recovery and intermittent self-catheterization rates (8% vs. 15%; P=0.28) were comparable.CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center observational cohort, the modified Bordeaux Neobladder demonstrated perioperative and early functional outcomes comparable to those of the Padua Ileal Bladder after RARC with intracorporeal orthotopic diversion. These findings require confirmation in larger multicenter studies with longer follow-up and objective functional assessment.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Robotic intracorporeal modified Bordeaux versus Padua ileal bladder: head-to-head surgical technique, perioperative and functional outcomes
Date Crossref
01/07/2026
Éditeur
Edizioni Minerva Medica
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Bladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsUreteral procedures and complicationsUrinary and Genital Oncology Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.