Snapshot at Saccharomycopsis fibuligera metabolism for industrial terpenoid production and bioengineering
Résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Microbial metabolic engineering increasingly depends on identifying robust non-conventional yeast chassis with favorable metabolic traits. Although Saccharomyces cerevisiae remains the main model for isoprenoid engineering, alternative yeasts may provide superior native precursor availability. Here, we report the first comparative metabolomic characterization of Saccharomycopsis fibuligera, focusing on the mevalonate and terpenoid backbone biosynthesis pathways. RESULTS: LC-MS profiling revealed elevated levels of acetyl-CoA, HMG-CoA, and MVA in S. fibuligera, suggesting strong native flux through the MVA pathway. The universal isoprenoid precursors IPP and DMAPP accumulated at substantially higher levels than in S. cerevisiae, together with enrichment of FPP and ergosterol abundance, indicating efficient channeling toward sterol biosynthesis. Conversely, upper glycolysis metabolites were reduced, while TCA cycle intermediates were enriched, supporting the proposed Crabtree-negative phenotype of S. fibuligera. Amino acid profiling also indicated enhanced nitrogen storage capacity. CONCLUSIONS: These results position S. fibuligera as a metabolically favorable platform with high intrinsic MVA pathway activity and precursor availability for terpenoid production, highlighting its strong potential as an emerging microbial chassis for next‑generation terpenoid bioproduction.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Snapshot at Saccharomycopsis fibuligera metabolism for industrial terpenoid production and bioengineering
- Date Crossref
- 10/07/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.