Integration of deworming into primary healthcare in Western Kenya: a quasi-experimental evaluation
Rattachement africain : no, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: The WHO 2030 NTD roadmap calls for integrating mass drug administration (MDA) into primary healthcare (PHC) systems. A coverage evaluation survey conducted in Western Kenya exposed the persistent limitations of mass drug administration campaigns, showing that nearly 25% of surveyed individuals never received treatment. The effect of stock-outs and ineffective mobilizations were also noted. To consolidate the gains from previous mass drug administrations (MDAs), integration of MDA into Primary Health Care (PHC) services was piloted through the Deworming Innovation Fund by leveraging community health structures and digital health platforms for improved delivery. Methodology: = 1,130). The intervention took 3 months. Household surveys measured preventive chemotherapy (PC) coverage, epidemiological coverage, awareness sources, and treatment uptake. Mixed methods included key informant interviews and focus group discussions. The primary outcome was PC coverage (target ≥75% per WHO). Findings: The integrated PHC model in the intervention group helped to increase deworming coverage from 58.4% to 75%; representing an adjusted odd ratio of 2.14 (95% CI: 1.48-3.09). This is in comparison to other control areas where coverage changed only marginally from 57.1% to 60.3%. However, the possible unmeasured programme and confounding implementation limits the quasi-experimental design. As a result, results are mostly relevant to county healthcare managers, NGOs and policymakers. These are people seeking scalable child healthcare interventions in endemic environments. Health facilities became a prominent awareness source only in intervention sites (30% at endline vs. 15% at baseline). In contrast, our study found lower non-treatment rates at 5% (compared to about a quarter reported in the 2024 MDA Coverage Evaluation Survey (CES), potentially reflecting the impact of the integrated approach or differences in recall period and sampling. The 5% of households reporting never receiving treatment were associated with various reasons, including; ineligibility (56%) or absence (17%), not lack of awareness (1%). Control wards showed sharp declines in awareness post-campaign, while intervention wards maintained or improved awareness through routine facility contacts. Recommendations: PHC-integrated deworming achieved effective coverage comparable to traditional campaigns, with superior sustainability of awareness.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Integration of deworming into primary healthcare in Western Kenya: a quasi-experimental evaluation
- Date Crossref
- 10/07/2026
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Development Fund pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisation à but non lucratif
-
Children's Investment Fund Foundation pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisation à but non lucratif
-
Amref Health Africa pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
Ministry of Health Vector-Borne & Neglected Tropical Diseases Unit pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
The END Fund pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
Reinit Research Limited pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
Children Investment Fund Foundation pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisation à but non lucratif
Development Fund, Children's Investment Fund Foundation et Amref Health Africa, avec 4 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.