Analysis code for: Bayesian sensory integration explains ball-count bias in Major League Baseball umpires
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Analysis code for the manuscript "Bayesian sensory integration explains ball-count bias in Major League Baseball umpires" by Mitsuto Tomomura and Masahiro Shinya This archive contains the complete analysis pipeline for quantifying the ball-count-dependent strike/ball decision bias of MLB home-plate umpires and explaining it with a Bayesian sensory integration model, together with the derived result files and figures reported in the manuscript. Data: MLB 2015-2024 regular and post-season games, 451,172 called pitches (four-seam fastballs thrown by right-handed pitchers to right-handed batters). Pipeline (numbered folders 00-05):- Data acquisition (Statcast pitch-tracking data and home-plate umpire assignments)- Merging and inclusion-criteria filtering- Count-wise psychometric (probit) function fits (point of subjective equality and perceptual uncertainty)- Two-component Gaussian Mixture Model of called-pitch locations (count-specific priors)- Trial-level Bayesian sensory integration model fit (count-specific vs. universal prior)- Umpire-wise individual-differences analysis (n = 89) Environment: Python 3.13 (pybaseball 2.2.7, pandas, pyarrow) and MATLAB R2022b (Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox). Raw and intermediate pitch-tracking data are not included, owing to file size and to avoid redistributing Baseball Savant data; they can be regenerated with the scripts in steps 00-01. See the included README.md for the full folder structure, reproduction instructions, and the correspondence between output files and the values reported in the manuscript. Version v1.1 de-anonymises the README, LICENSE, and code headers. The analysis code, derived results, and figures are unchanged from v1.0.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.