Advantage-Conditioned Flow Policy for Offline Reinforcement Learning in Recommendation
Rattachement africain : au. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Offline reinforcement learning (RL) is a useful approach for recommender systems because it can optimize long-term user feedback from logged interaction data without online exploration. A key challenge is the multi-modal nature of user preferences: a user may like several unrelated item types, so a unimodal policy (for example, a Gaussian) tends to average across modes and generate actions that do not match any interest. Recent diffusion-based policies can model complex preference distributions, but they often require many denoising steps. We propose PerfRec (Preference-aware Flow for Recommendation), a flow-matching offline RL framework that learns an expressive behavioral policy and distills it into an efficient one-step policy. PerfRec (i) trains a conditional flow model to clone the logged action distribution, (ii) trains twin Q-networks using next actions sampled from the learned flow policy, and (iii) trains an advantage-conditioned one-step policy with Q-guidance for improvement and a distillation loss that keeps the policy close to the flow policy. We use binary advantage conditioning to separate high-advantage and low-advantage regions of the flow-induced action distribution, so that at inference we can sample from the high-advantage mode with a single forward pass. Experiments on five benchmark datasets and one online simulation platform show that PerfRec improves recommendation performance over strong offline RL baselines.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Advantage-Conditioned Flow Policy for Offline Reinforcement Learning in Recommendation
- Date Crossref
- 19/07/2026
- Éditeur
- ACM
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.