Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Delphi survey to explore core curriculum for training the next generation of hepatologists

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
80Institutions déclarées
49Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : cn, de, hk, gb, ca, es, us, fr, kr, it, tr, mm, Ouganda, am, bd, pk, id, se, fi, jp, th, ph, vn, Afrique du Sud, lk, az, sg, mx, nz, sa, lb, Algérie, br, ae, nl, Soudan, om, Ghana, Égypte, ch, ro, ie, my, pt, at, in, gr, be, au. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatology is experiencing major shifts in disease etiologies and is raising demand for multidisciplinary care. However, a globally harmonized framework defining core training content remains lacking. We aimed to develop a globally informed expert consensus framework for the content of core hepatology training, to provide a structured foundation for curriculum development. METHODS: A two-round modified Delphi using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was conducted. A comprehensive list of curriculum items was developed from international training standards, refined by a steering committee, and rated by a stratified international panel. Consensus was determined using medians and a disagreement index (DI), which classified curriculum items as essential, desirable, or optional. RESULTS: A total of 456 experts completed Round 1, of whom 78.7% also completed Round 2. Consensus was strongest for foundational knowledge and core diagnostic skills, including interpretation of abnormal liver function and liver screening test results, and non-invasive fibrosis assessment (both DI = 0). Management of major liver diseases was consistently prioritized as essential. Procedures with the highest endorsement for independent performance were paracentesis, transient elastography, variceal screening, and endoscopic variceal therapy. Consensus was limited for conventional ultrasonography and advanced interventions, reflecting regional variability in resources and scope of practice. Most experts (79.1%) supported formal training in research methodology, and the median recommended fellowship length was 24 months. Subgroup differences were mainly observed in selected resource-dependent or highly specialized items. CONCLUSIONS: This global consensus offers a priority-stratified outline of core hepatology training content providing a practical foundation for curriculum development and staged implementation across diverse health systems. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: Our study provides a consensus-based, priority-stratified framework for core hepatology training content that may inform curriculum development and local adaptation, given the growing global burden of liver disease and the heterogeneity of training standards. This framework may support curriculum mapping and local adaptation for trainees, program directors, professional societies, and policymakers, including in settings where structured hepatology training pathways are still evolving. In practical terms, these findings may assist educators and institutions in reviewing and refining national curricula and training structures. However, specific implementation decisions, including accreditation requirements and procedural training standards, will need to be adapted to local regulatory and resource contexts. Recognizing that these recommendations are based on expert consensus rather than outcome data and may be variably implementable in resource-limited settings, the next steps are pilot implementation in diverse settings, evaluation of trainee and patient outcomes, and iterative revision, supported by coordinated efforts from societies, governments, and training institutions.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Delphi survey to explore core curriculum for training the next generation of hepatologists
Date Crossref
01/09/2026
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • State Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases pays non établi dans la notice
    Structure de recherche
  • Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong Department of Medicine and Therapeutics pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Queen Mary University of London Blizard Institute pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Blizard Institute pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • McGill University Health Centre Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Foundation for Liver Research pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisation à but non lucratif
  • Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla pays non établi dans la notice
    Structure de recherche
  • NYU Langone Health pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Inserm pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisme public

National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University et State Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, avec 9 autres affiliations. Pays d’affiliation : Ouganda, Afrique du Sud, Algérie, Soudan, Ghana, Égypte.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Innovations in Medical EducationGlobal Health and SurgeryRadiology practices and education

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.