Estradiol Enhances Alveolar Bone Resorption by Promoting Osteoclast Differentiation in Experimental Periodontitis

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background/Objectives: Estrogen is a key female hormone; however, its role in periodontitis remains poorly understood. This study investigated the effects of 17β-estradiol (E2) on experimental periodontitis using an ovariectomy (OVX) model with E2 administration. Methods: Female mice aged 8–10 weeks underwent OVX, followed by induction of ligature-induced periodontitis, and subsequent quantification of alveolar bone resorption. Additional groups received an aromatase inhibitor or E2 supplementation after OVX, with subsequent induction of periodontitis and evaluation of bone resorption. Histological analysis assessed multinucleated giant cells and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-positive osteoclasts on the bone surface. Gingival tissue was analyzed for gene expression related to osteoclastogenesis. The effect of E2 on osteoclast differentiation from bone marrow cells was also examined. Results: OVX significantly reduced serum E2 levels and decreased alveolar bone resorption. Aromatase inhibitor administration similarly reduced bone loss. Histological evaluation revealed a reduced number of resorbing osteoclasts in OVX mice, whereas E2 supplementation increased osteoclast numbers. No significant changes in inflammatory cytokine or receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) expression were observed. E2 promoted osteoclast differentiation in vitro, and treatment with E2 prior to RANKL stimulation further increased the number of osteoclasts. This effect was suppressed by an estrogen receptor antagonist. Moreover, E2 enhanced the expression of osteoclast differentiation–associated genes in the presence of RANKL, an effect abolished by tamoxifen. Conclusions: E2 increased alveolar bone resorption in experimental periodontitis, likely by promoting osteoclast differentiation, independent of inflammatory cytokine or RANKL gene expression.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.