30 years of ENLP: developing nutrition leaders for positive change – lessons learnt and ways forward
Rattachement africain : rs, it, jp, kr, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Launched in 1994, the European Nutrition Leadership Platform (ENLP) has evolved over three decades into a unique and internationally recognised initiative for the development of leadership skills in the field of nutrition and public health. Through its two training programmes, the ENLP Essentials programme, designed primarily for early-career professionals and emerging leaders in nutrition, food science, and health, and the ENLP Advanced programme, tailored to mid-career and senior professionals seeking to enhance their leadership capacity, equips participants with scientific communication and interpersonal skills while fostering resilience, authenticity, and cross-sector collaboration. With more than 1000 graduates, many of whom now hold leading positions in academia, industry, government, and non-governmental organisations, the programme has proven its impact on professional development and the nutrition landscape. At IUNS-ICN 2025 in Paris, the ENLP celebrated its 30 th anniversary and emphasised that leadership in the nutrition sector is best defined by authenticity, caring, resilience, and shared values. In the coming decades, the programme will continue to focus on inclusivity, adaptability, and vision, demonstrating that investing in people is the most powerful lever for improving nutrition and public health.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- 30 years of ENLP: developing nutrition leaders for positive change – lessons learnt and ways forward
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.