Evidence for a relationship between concentrations of nucleos/tide analogue agents and treatment outcome in chronic hepatitis B infection: A systematic review
Résumé fourni par la source
INTRODUCTION: Treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection relies on nucleos(t)ide analogues to achieve viral suppression, with tenofovir or entecavir as first-line agents. Expanding treatment, and improving its outcomes, are crucial strategies to support progress towards global viral hepatitis elimination targets. However, therapeutic drug monitoring has not been optimized for HBV therapy. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO CRD420250599139) to identify studies reporting on the relationship between drug concentrations and treatment outcomes of HBV in English from PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. Primary search included people living with HBV, with or without HIV coinfection, treated with tenofovir and/or entecavir, with drug concentrations measured and linked to treatment outcome. RESULTS: Six studies were identified, of which five reported on HIV/HBV coinfection, and one on HBV monoinfection. Across studies, tenofovir concentrations >800 fmol/punch in dried blood spots were typically associated with viraemic suppression for both HIV and HBV. Evidence suggests that higher tenofovir concentrations (e.g. 1000-1500 fmol/punch) may be required for consistent HBV suppression. DISCUSSION: A therapeutic threshold cannot currently be defined for concentrations of tenofovir or entecavir in HBV. Larger cohort studies focusing on HBV monoinfection are needed to define therapeutic drug thresholds to optimize personalized care for people living with HBV.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Evidence for a relationship between concentrations of nucleos/tide analogue agents and treatment outcome in chronic hepatitis B infection: A systematic review
- Date Crossref
- 01/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.