Impact of vitamin D on the colon cancer immune microenvironment: results of a randomized clinical trial of preoperative vitamin D supplementation in patients with stage I-III colon cancer
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Although vitamin D (VitD) exhibits anti-tumor activity in colorectal cancer (CRC) preclinically, its effects in the human tumor microenvironment (TME) remain unclear. We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of preoperative high-dose VitD supplementation in stage I-III colon cancer patients to assess its impact on the TME. Forty-two patients received either VitD3 (50,000 IU/day for 7 days, then 10,000 IU/day) or placebo before surgery. Spatial immune-profiling and assessment of VitD receptor (VDR) and CYP27B1 expression were performed on paired tumor samples from 24 patients. VitD significantly increased plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (P<0.001), increased CD3+CD8+ memory T cells (P=0.03), reduced CD3+CD4+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells (P=0.02) and spatially re-organized the TME, leading to greater T cell and tumor cell proximity. Post-treatment VDR expression was heterogeneous and decreased overall (P=0.02). Spatial transcriptomic profiling of post-treatment resections reflected predominantly repressive VDR activity. These findings support an immunomodulatory role for VitD, warranting further mechanistic investigation.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Impact of vitamin D on the colon cancer immune microenvironment: results of a randomized clinical trial of preoperative vitamin D supplementation in patients with stage I-III colon cancer
- Date Crossref
- 08/07/2026
- Éditeur
- American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.