Estimating Grassland Production in Central Europe Using Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data and a Novel Compilation of Field Observations
Résumé fourni par la source
Monitoring the condition of grasslands is essential given their vital role in food security, carbon sequestration and other ecosystem services. Harvested aboveground biomass (HAB) and aboveground net primary production (ANPP) are among the most important grassland state indicators. However, spatially explicit production estimates are largely lacking, and grassland area estimations also remain uncertain. This study addresses these gaps for drought-prone Central European grasslands over 2017–2024. We synthesized grassland extent data, collected extensive field measurements on biomass (BM), and used remote sensing-based biophysical proxies to build an ensemble of six linear models for spatial extrapolation at 10 m resolution. Bayesian framework was used for the linear model fitting that also considers uncertainty of the observations. The ensemble mean ANPP was 310.7 ± 19 gBM m−2, with modest interannual variability. Upscaled country-wide mean ANPP was 34.3 ± 13.3 Mt year−1. The results indicate that, within the frame of the present study, the remote sensing-based linear model selection has a larger influence on the country totals than the grassland area database selection. The results highlight that both grassland area uncertainty and model construction are major sources of uncertainty in biomass estimation that have to be addressed in future studies.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Estimating Grassland Production in Central Europe Using Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data and a Novel Compilation of Field Observations
- Date Crossref
- 08/07/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.