Long-Term Monitoring of Coastal Forest Restoration Using Landsat Time-Series in Northwestern Tunisia
Le résumé fourni par la source
Coastal dune ecosystems play an essential role in shoreline stabilization, biodiversity conservation, and carbon storage, but they are increasingly threatened by human activities and climate-related disturbances. This study assessed long-term forest vegetation dynamics in restored coastal dune ecosystems in northwestern Tunisia, integrating a 30-year Landsat dataset (1994–2024) with Random Forest classification. We quantified changes in forest and shrubland cover, evaluated the effectiveness of dune stabilization reforestation (Pinus pinea and Acacia spp.), and assessed the impact of the 2023 wildfire on forest biomass and carbon stocks. The findings demonstrate that reforestation efforts reduced mobile sand areas by 42.9% over three decades, with 78% of the sand loss attributable to vegetation stabilization. When infrastructure-affected areas were excluded, sand decreased by 64.7%, confirming genuine forest restoration success. The 2023 wildfire caused substantial forest biomass losses in the reforested pine stands (264.19 t·ha⁻¹) and carbon reductions (124.17 t·ha⁻¹). These losses reflect the high vulnerability of Mediterranean coastal forests to wildfire disturbances under recurrent summer drought and increasing temperatures. The study emphasizes the importance of long-term remote sensing time-series for coastal forest management and restoration planning in Mediterranean ecosystems.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Long-Term Monitoring of Coastal Forest Restoration Using Landsat Time-Series in Northwestern Tunisia
- Date Crossref
- 06/07/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.