Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Partitioning evapotranspiration in C3-C4 mixed tallgrass prairies: An inter-comparison of five methods and evaluation of seasonal parameterization

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
4Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Accurate estimates of transpiration (T) remain particularly challenging in mixed C 3 -C 4 ecosystems, where the relative dominance of species and their physiological characteristics shifts dynamically throughout the growing season. Some methods for evapotranspiration (ET) partitioning, such as Flux Variance Similarity (FVS), typically require an explicit specification of either C 3 or C 4 photosynthetic pathways to parameterize intercellular carbon dioxide concentrations (c i ). Other methods, such as Modified Relaxed Eddy Accumulation (MREA), Conditional Eddy Covariance (CEC), Conditional Eddy Accumulation (CEA), and the FVS optimum approach, do not require prior c i approximations or designation of C 3 and C 4 vegetation. This study evaluated and inter-compared five ET partitioning methods: FVS, MREA, CEA, CEC, and a water-use efficiency-integrated modification of CEC (CECw) within two differently managed (grazing and hay harvest) C 3 -C 4 mixed tallgrass prairies in Central Oklahoma, USA. Specifically, we investigated how partitioning outputs varied when using a static, year-round C 4 parameterization compared to a seasonally dynamic C 3 -C 4 framework. Results indicated that T:ET ratios from FVS methods using constant c i values or c i /c a ratios were similar across seasonal and annual scales, regardless of whether a year-round C 4 or temporally dynamic C 3 -C 4 parameterization was applied. During peak growth, MREA and CEC produced the highest T:ET ratios (0.93–0.95), whereas FVS and CEA yielded more moderate values (<0.75), and CECw provided the lowest estimates (0.56–0.62). Consequently, MREA and CEC estimated T 10–20% higher than the biophysically reasonable estimates from FVS and CEA. Methodological discrepancies were most pronounced during periods when either stomatal or non-stomatal fluxes dominated, with closer agreement occurring when these exchanges were nearly equivalent. Validation against lysimeter measurements showed that FVS and CECw optimum approaches performed best (r = 0.84–0.85; RMSE = 0.23–0.25 mm d −1 ), while other methods deviated substantially. As the first intercomparison of five partitioning methods in mixed C 3 -C 4 tallgrass prairies, this study demonstrates that the choice of method significantly influences the resulting ecosystem water budget.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Partitioning evapotranspiration in C3-C4 mixed tallgrass prairies: An inter-comparison of five methods and evaluation of seasonal parameterization
Date Crossref
01/08/2026
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Plant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsBioenergy crop production and managementAgroforestry and silvopastoral systems

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.