Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Internal urethrotomy versus Optilume™ drug-coated balloon dilatation for the management of anterior urethral strictures: morbidity comparison of the techniques

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
7Institutions déclarées
3Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : ch, de, it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

INTRODUCTION: Direct visual internal urethrotomy (DVIU) for short anterior urethral strictures is associated with a high rate of stricture recurrence. Optilume™ drug-coated balloon (ODCB) has recently emerged as a minimally invasive treatment alternative. However, comparative data between ODCB and DVIU are limited. This multicenter study aims to compare the two procedures in terms of functional outcomes and stricture-free survival (SFS) in patients with anterior urethral strictures. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included 140 patients treated for anterior urethral stricture under 3 cm in length with either ODCB dilatation or internal urethrotomy. Data were collected from five European tertiary referral centers between November 2010 and April 2026. Stricture length was assessed by either cystoscopy, retrograde urethrography, or both. Stricture recurrence during follow-up was defined as symptomatic restenosis requiring reintervention. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of recurrence. SFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimates, with group comparisons assessed using the log-rank test. KEY FINDINGS: A total of 68 (48%) patients underwent DVIU and 72 (52%) ODCB. Prior stricture treatment had been performed in 6 (9%) in the internal urethrotomy group and 56 (78%) in the ODCB group (p < 0.001). Prior dilatations were performed in 6 (9%) patients for DVIU and 27 (38%) for ODCB dilatation (p < 0.001). The groups were otherwise similar with regards to baseline characteristics, including stricture length, diabetes mellitus, stricture site. The median follow-up was 12 months (IQR: 4-29) in the internal urethrotomy group and 9.5 months (IQR: 5-14) in the ODCB group. Postoperative complications were reported in 3% of patients after DVIU and 6% after ODCB dilatation. Median preoperative IPSS was 20.5 (15-26) for DVIU and 18.5 (11-25) for ODCB dilatation (p = 0.4). The median IPSS after three months was 16 (13-20) for DVIU and 6.5 (3-11) for ODCB dilatation (p < 0.001). The type of surgery was not predictive of stricture recurrence at multivariable cox regression analysis. SFS after 12 months was 67% (95% CI: 56-80%) for internal urethrotomy and 68% (95% CI: 50-82%) for Optilume™ (p = 0.81). CONCLUSIONS: Despite being used in a substantially more pretreated cohort, ODCB dilatation showed similar safety and SFS after 12 months as compared to DVIU, suggesting a potential role as an effective salvage strategy after failed endoscopic treatment or even early line treatment. Future prospective studies are needed to better define selection criteria and optimal treatment sequencing.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Internal urethrotomy versus Optilume™ drug-coated balloon dilatation for the management of anterior urethral strictures: morbidity comparison of the techniques
Date Crossref
07/07/2026
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Urological Disorders and TreatmentsPelvic floor disorders treatmentsHernia repair and management

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.