Hepatic multimodal phenotyping in AL amyloidosis with cardiac involvement: the D-Amy-LIPHE study
Rattachement africain : fr, au, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: In light-chain (AL) amyloidosis, liver involvement is defined using arbitrary criteria such as hepatomegaly or elevated Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP). We aimed to determine its prevalence and to characterize its phenotype and prognostic impact. METHODS: = 12). Predictors of liver involvement were identified using logistic regression. Unsupervised clustering analysis was performed to identify distinct patterns of liver involvement. RESULTS: Liver involvement was identified in 71 patients (35%) and was independently associated with digestive and renal amyloidosis, liver uptake and increased vena cava diameter. Clustering analysis identified three phenotypes: a cardiac cluster, characterized by severe cardiac failure and congestive hepatopathy associated with elevated bilirubin; a hepatic cluster, marked by multivisceral amyloidosis, elevated γGT and ALP, in which liver involvement reflected amyloid deposition; an intermediate cluster with milder abnormalities and better prognosis. Histological findings supported this. Sixty-month survival was 32%, 44% and 54% in the cardiac, hepatic and intermediate clusters, respectively. CONCLUSION: Liver involvement in AL amyloidosis is due to both amyloid deposition and cardiac congestion. Clustering analysis revealed distinct liver patterns with different prognoses.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Hepatic multimodal phenotyping in AL amyloidosis with cardiac involvement: the D-Amy-LIPHE study
- Date Crossref
- 06/07/2026
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.