Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

The uterine scar dilemma: Outcomes of a restricted elective repeat cesarean section policy in a high‐fertility, resource‐limited setting

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
5Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

INTRODUCTION: The global increase in cesarean section (CS) rates poses particular challenges in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In high-fertility, resource-limited settings, deciding the optimal mode of delivery for women with a uterine scar is complex. Elective repeat CS (ERCS) is often preferred over trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC), despite limited evidence on its safety and feasibility. This study aimed to describe clinical management and birth outcomes among women with prior cesarean section managed under a restricted ERCS policy and to identify prognostic factors to inform delivery decisions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study at EMERGENCY Hospital, Panjshir Province, Afghanistan, from October 2016 to December 2021. ERCS was limited to women with clear medical indications. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were described separately for women scheduled for TOLAC and those scheduled for ERCS. Within the TOLAC group, logistic regression analyses identified predictors of successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: Among 2730 eligible women, 2621 (96.0%) attempted TOLAC, achieving a VBAC success rate of 88.2%. Uterine rupture occurred in 30 cases, all within the TOLAC group. Placenta accreta spectrum was the strongest predictor of adverse maternal outcomes, particularly in the ERCS group. Induction of labor with misoprostol was independently associated with neonatal mortality. Successful VBAC was associated with a single prior CS performed for indications other than obstructed labor and with spontaneous labor onset, particularly among women with a history of prior vaginal delivery. Maternal mortality was rare and unrelated to uterine scar complications. Overall, neonatal outcomes were favorable, with high rates of discharge in good condition. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal birth was achieved in the majority of women attempting TOLAC. A single prior CS performed for a non-obstructed labor indication and spontaneous labor onset was associated with higher VBAC success and favorable neonatal outcomes. Promoting VBAC, alongside careful decision-making regarding primary CSs, may reduce long-term maternal and neonatal risks associated with repeat CS and help mitigate the growing burden of operative deliveries in LMICs.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
The uterine scar dilemma: Outcomes of a restricted elective repeat cesarean section policy in a high‐fertility, resource‐limited setting
Date Crossref
06/07/2026
Éditeur
Wiley
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal and fetal healthcareGlobal Maternal and Child Health

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune donnée externe enregistrée en base. Sources et limites.