Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Challenges and facilitators for mental health care for operational stress injuries in the military: A qualitative study.

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Introduction: Military members and Veterans have an increased risk of mental health (MH) conditions compared with the general population. In light of the underutilization of MH services in this population, it is important to examine the factors that either obstruct or facilitate access to MH treatment, as well as ongoing participation. This knowledge is key to developing effective strategies that enhance accessibility to these services and encourage treatment-seeking behaviour. This study aimed to provide a nuanced understanding of personal and systemic factors that influence Canadian Veteran MH care. Methods: Thirteen Canadian Armed Forces Veterans were recruited via physician referral from the Operational Stress Injury Clinic in London, Ontario, and interviewed using a qualitative interpretive phenomenological approach (IPA). Interviews were coded and analyzed using standard IPA guidelines. Results: Analyses revealed six superordinate themes: perceived need for treatment, motivation to seek treatment, accessibility and adequacy of MH resources, experiences during treatment, influence of social support, and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their MH. Discussion: This study emphasizes the importance of understanding Canadian Veterans as a distinct cultural group with unique needs and challenges, including stigma, self-reliance, and difficulties navigating health care systems. This research examined the mixed impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Veteran participants. It had a small sample size and primarily included male participants. Future research should focus on under-represented Veterans groups (e.g., women) and those who have not sought treatment to inform interventions and improve overall MH outcomes for this population.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

La source scientifique ouverte est momentanément indisponible.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Lawson Health Research Institute pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • St Joseph's Health Care pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Queen's University pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • MacDonald Franklin OSI Research Centre pays non établi dans la notice
    Structure de recherche
  • St. Joseph's Operational Stress Injury Clinic pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • School of Rehabilitation Therapy pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure

Lawson Health Research Institute, St Joseph's Health Care et Queen's University, avec 3 autres affiliations.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchCOVID-19 and Mental HealthMigration, Health and Trauma

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.