Therapists’ Perspectives on Using the Worker Role Interview in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation in Bangladesh
Rattachement africain : au, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background Spinal cord injury is common in the working age population in Bangladesh, and work participation following injury is complex due to its physical, psychological, social and economic impacts on the lives of injured persons, their families and communities. Few evidence-based resources are available to occupational therapists in Bangladesh to guide their practice in supporting work re-engagement of this population. Objective To explore the Occupational Therapists’ experiences about the usefulness of the Worker Role Interview in spinal cord injury rehabilitation in Bangladesh. Method Occupational therapists at a rehabilitation centre received training to use the Worker Role Interview. Four therapists in the spinal unit were then recruited, and participated in individual semi-structured interviews. Data was analysed using thematic analysis. Results Four themes were identified: supports patients’ agency to express themselves and work possibilities; initiates self-inquiry about the prospects of working; facilitates understanding of patients beyond their injury; and contextualising the interview for local practice. Conclusion The Worker Role Interview provides a useful way for occupational therapists in Bangladesh to understand how people view their work after spinal cord injury, which may promote the design of client-centred and meaningful interventions.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Therapists’ Perspectives on Using the Worker Role Interview in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation in Bangladesh
- Date Crossref
- 06/07/2026
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.