Lenalidomide enhances CD19 CAR-T cell fitness and target-cell engagement in relapsed/refractory CLL

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background CD19-directed CAR-T cell therapy can induce durable remissions in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), but response rates are lower than in other B-cell malignancies, in part because CLL is characterized by T-cell dysfunction, defective immune synapse formation, and impaired target-cell co-stimulation. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug with the potential to act on both sides of the CAR-T/CLL interface by improving T-cell fitness and modifying malignant B-cell susceptibility to immune engagement. Methods We are conducting an open-label, non-randomized phase I/II clinical trial VTB-CLL002 ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06762431 ) evaluating the safety and efficacy of CD19 CAR-T cell therapy combined with concomitant lenalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory CLL and small lymphocytic lymphoma followed by lenalidomide maintenance. The primary endpoint was safety. The secondary endpoint included overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results Twelve patients were treated. The median age was 60 years and the median number of prior lines of therapy was 2. All patients were BTK inhibitor-naive, and all had measurable disease at the time of infusion. CAR-T manufacturing was successful in all patients. All treated patients achieved complete remission, with a median time to response of 1 month. CAR T-cells expansion was observed in all patients, with a median peak expansion of 137 cells/µL and a median time to peak expansion of 14 days. CAR T-cells remained detectable at the last follow-up in all patients, with persistence documented up to 24 months. At dose levels 2–3, eight of nine patients had ongoing MRD-negative responses at the time of analysis. Toxicity was clinically meaningful. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in all patients, with severe CRS observed in 2 of 12 patients. ICANS occurred in 5 of 12 patients, including severe ICANS in 4 of 12 patients. One patient developed late grade 4 ICANS temporally associated with lenalidomide reintroduction and secondary CAR-T expansion. Early and late immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity were common. In mechanistic studies, lenalidomide enhanced CAR-T proliferation and cytotoxicity, shifted CAR-T cells toward effector-associated phenotypes, reduced selected exhaustion markers during repeated antigen challenge, and increased IL-2 and IFN-γ secretion. Lenalidomide also increased CAR-T/CLL conjugate formation and upregulated CD54/ICAM-1 on CLL target cells without broad induction of CD80, CD86, or CD40, consistent with improved adhesive target-cell engagement rather than classical co-stimulation. Transcriptomic profiling supported enhanced Th1/cytotoxic and T-cell activation-associated programs with lower T reg-associated genes in lenalidomide-treated CAR-T cells. Conclusions Lenalidomide-augmented CD19 CAR-T therapy demonstrated strong early clinical activity in relapsed/refractory CLL, characterized by deep responses, durable CAR-T persistence, and substantial incidence of immune effector-associated toxicities. These findings support further evaluation of lenalidomide as a rational CAR-T partner in CLL and suggest that its activity may involve both improved CAR-T fitness and enhanced target-cell engagement. Future studies should optimize lenalidomide timing and dosing to preserve response depth while reducing delayed immune-effector toxicity. Key points Key point 1 Lenalidomide may improve CD19 CAR-T activity in CLL by acting on both CAR-T cells and CLL cancer cells, enhancing immune synapse formation and effector function. Key point 2 In 12 R/R CLL patients, combination therapy with lenalidomide and CD19 CAR-T cells demonstrated a high complete remission rate, frequent MRD negativity, and durable persistence, despite a high but manageable incidence of ICANS.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.