Hierarchical classification of hematologic malignancies using epigenetic and genetic information
Rattachement africain : de, us, gb, es, at, be. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT Molecular testing in hematology requires different assays for disease subgroup identification, risk stratification and selection of appropriate treatment regimens. Yet, molecular tests are not necessarily standardized between diagnostic laboratories, resulting in varying turnaround times and potentially divergent results. To resolve this issue and enable single-assay molecular testing, we have developed a hierarchical classification framework that combines epigenetic and genetic data from whole genome nanopore sequencing (WGNS) with machine learning to determine disease entities, epigenetic subgroups (epitypes) and genetic aberrations in hematopoietic neoplasms. We curated DNA methylation data from 5,420 samples and trained a classifier allowing entity-level diagnostics featuring 21 conditions, including healthy controls, acute and chronic myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms. This classifier was subsequently combined with entity-specific epitype classifiers predicting 44 therapeutically or prognostically relevant states, followed by integration of genetic data. Benchmarking of the combined (epi-)genetic testing strategy using WGNS confirmed high accuracy in the detection of diagnostic groups and risk stratification, and identified diagnosis-defining molecular alterations that were not reported by standard-of-care work-up.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Hierarchical classification of hematologic malignancies using epigenetic and genetic information
- Date Crossref
- 03/07/2026
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.